The difference of getting to hear feedback from others before explaining my poems to them vs after was really interesting. I liked getting to read my poem aloud the way I had written it to others then having them reflect on that. I believe it gave them a different perspective that was able to help them come up with other notes than what they had originally written by reading it and interpreting it by themselves. I preferred the peer review the way we did with groups of 3 that way you aren’t just hearing from one other person. This made it easier to bounce ideas off of each other and brainstorm to improve not just my own poem, but my partners. Hearing from my own professor was also helpful granted that the revision process doesn’t normally involve one’s professor. So, getting feedback from the one who teaches the poetry class was something I appreciated having the opportunity of. In terms of revising my poems, I made minor edits from the suggestions I was given. I find it difficult coming to terms with the way my poems turn out. This is because I always feel like there is room for improvement. Having read my poems over and over again, looking for ways to make it better, taking in the feedback I was given by others, it’s hard to make final edits. The way I avoided going down a constant hole of this was by not overanalyzing things too deeply. I am pleased with the outcome of my poems because I enjoyed the challenging writing process of them and they are something of a topic that resonates with me.